Satz 1. Sowohl die Summe wie das Produkt zweier Polynome über <> oder <> ist ein Polynom über <> bzw. <> Beweis. Sei f(x)=Sum{i=0,...,m:a_i x^i} und g(x)=Sum{i=0,...,n:b_i x^i}. Dann ist

f(x)+g(x)=Sum{i=0,...,max(m,n):(a_i +b_i )x^i}

und

f(x)g(x)=Sum{i=0,...,m+n:c_i x^i}

mit

c_i =Sum{j=0,...,i:a_j b_i-j}

Dabei haben die Koeffizienten a_i mit i<0 oder i>m der Wert 0; analog für die n_i.

Satz 2. Das Produkt zweier primitiver Polynome über <> ist ein primitives Polynom über <>. Beweis. (1) Polynomials can be multiplied to yield polynomials. (2) Polynomials can be divided, yielding a quotient polynomial and a remainder polynomial with a degree less than the degree of the divisor polynomial, i.e. For f(x), g(x) there is q(x) and r(x) with f(x) = g(x) * q(x) + r(x) and degree(r) < degree(g) (3) If f(z) = 0, then f(x) is divisible by (x-z). (Proof: Divide according to (2) and see what happens when x = z) (4) If h(x) = f(x) * g(x) has all coefficients divisible by some prime p, then already one of f and g has had. (Proof: what are the coefficients of h? If there are coefficients of both f and g that are not divisable by p, then one of the coefficients is also not divisible by p.) (5) From (3) and (4), one can conclude that if f(z) = 0 for rational z = p/q, then f(x) is divisible by (xq - p) yielding a polynomial with integer coefficients. (6) From (1) and (5) you can infer the theorem.