Return-Path: <owner-cvnet@lawton.ewind.com>
X-Original-To: u7f01aa@mail.lrz-muenchen.de
Delivered-To: u7f01aa@mail.lrz-muenchen.de
Received: from lxmhs13.lrz-muenchen.de (mailha13.lrz-muenchen.de [129.187.254.31])
	by mailin.lrz-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3B46A8FF
	for <u7f01aa@mail.lrz-muenchen.de>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de (mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de [129.187.254.102])
	by lxmhs13.lrz-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA0B80A233
	for <Hans.Strasburger@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from scan3.mail.lrz.de (scan3.mail.lrz.de [10.156.6.37]) by mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de with ESMTP for Hans.Strasburger@lrz.uni-muenchen.de; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:41 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in 37
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.246
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.094,
	BAYES_50=0.8, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, LRZ_FROM_PRE_SURa=0.001,
	LRZ_HAS_IN_REPLY_TO=0.001, LRZ_HAS_REFERENCES=0.001,
	LRZ_HAS_SENDER=0.001, LRZ_MSGID_APPLE_MAIL=0.001,
	LRZ_MSGID_FROM_DOMAIN=0.001, LRZ_XM_APPLE_MAIL=0.001,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled
Received: from mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de ([10.156.6.1])
	by scan3.mail.lrz.de (scan3.mail.lrz.de [10.156.6.23]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id O-Ayc1MD8VSo for <Hans.Strasburger@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>;
	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from postrelay2.lrz.de ([10.156.6.209] [10.156.6.209]) by mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de with ESMTP for Hans.Strasburger@lrz.uni-muenchen.de; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:40 +0200
Received: from lawton.ewind.com (lawton.ewind.com [68.166.223.203])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by postrelay2.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8FA22400084
	for <Hans.Strasburger@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:21:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lawton.ewind.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by lawton.ewind.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p8QFIt3b011601;
	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:18:55 -0700
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by lawton.ewind.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id p8QFItmj011600;
	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:18:55 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: lawton.ewind.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cvnet@lawton.ewind.com using -f
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: CVNet - An LCD monitor for research in vision
From: Michael Bach <Michael.Bach@uni-freiburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <201109250752.p8P7quMx024747@lawton.ewind.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:40:29 +0200
Message-Id: <1BB5BA09-5E1C-4159-9148-C265D1EC944A@uni-freiburg.de>
References: <CE43486A-1A98-415B-AA53-E6E6D2D63B38@gmail.com> 	<201101271623.p0RGNqOW031498@lawton.ewind.com> <AANLkTinwuOCabV_0dJjuorwuQJ0VPYB6SFe7p-c+Jvzg@mail.gmail.com> <201109250752.p8P7quMx024747@lawton.ewind.com>
To: CVNet CVNet <cvnet@mail.ewind.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO
X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5
X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0
X-NAI-Spam-Report: 1 Rules triggered
 	*  0 -- RV3991
X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <3991> : streams <685234> : uri
  <968827>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lawton.ewind.com id p8Q7eeFE007459
Sender: owner-cvnet@lawton.ewind.com
Precedence: bulk

Dear fellow CVNetters interested in visual display units:

I bought a Samsung SyncMaster 2233 on Danko's recommendation. Yes, nice monitor, but: This one and _all_ LCDs I looked at and heard about suffer from luminance artifacts due to asymmetric hi-lo switching delays. Just display a checkerboard (even number of checks, and centered) and reverse check contrast: there should be no net change in mean luminance, but there is a brief transient artifact. Depending on contrast, this can be a brief increment or decrement. Easily seen by placing a white sheet moderately close to the display and observing it while the stimulus reverses, ideally at about 10 reversals per second.

Such pattern-reversal stimuli (which are unfortunately often termed "flicker stimuli" in the fMRI literature) thus actually do flicker, totally unacceptable for many of my applications.


Best, Michael.
-- 
Prof. Michael Bach PhD, Ophthalmology, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
President of ISCEV <http://www.iscev.org/>
Visual illusions:  <http://michaelbach.de/ot/>

-------------------------------------------------------------------
To get information on using CVNet, send a note to: majordomo@mail.ewind.com
In the body of the message, enter: info cvnet


